Dr. Soumya Swaminathan, the Chief Scientist at the World Health Organisation (WHO), has been deemed complicit in the suppression of effective treatments for COVID by spreading deliberate disinformation about any alternatives to the vaccination program, by the Indian Bar Association.
As a range of doctors and scientists are now saying a large proportion of COVID fatalities may have had a chance at survival had they been given the opportunity of early treatment with seemingly effective medications like Hydroxychloroquine and Ivermectin, treatments which have been heavily suppressed and practically outlawed by WHO and other regulator authorities.
Can it argued that the hundreds thousands of people who perished from COVID for lack of treatment, did so for the greater good of the vaccine ?
WHO Chief Scientist Dr. Soumya Swaminathan has been conflicted before, in having to present a public false image of perfectly safe and effective vaccines, while in private pleading with industry to take vaccine safety seriously, particularly in the developing world where vaccine deaths are causing much suspicion and a loss of trust.
Dr. Soumya Swaminathan’s statement at the Global Vaccine Safety Summit in December 2019 shortly before the outbreak of the Coronavirus pandemic is very telling indeed :-
“I think we cannot overemphasize the fact that we really don’t have good safety monitoring systems in many countries, and this adds to the miscommunication and misapprehensions because we’re not able to give clear cut answers when people ask about the deaths that have occurred due to a particular vaccine, and this always gets blown up in the media.
One should be able to give a very factual account of what exactly has happened, and what the cause of deaths are, but in most cases there is some obfuscation at that level, and therefore there is less and less trust then in the system”
It would be dishonest if not ridiculous to maintain that a tablet is “safe and effective”, as it would surely depend on what was in the tablet, who was taking it, and what for ailment … the same no less applies to vaccines.
If only the nuanced debate about the safety and effectiveness of vaccines and other treatments could held honestly in public, rather than secretly behind closed doors.